- Joined
- Sep 17, 2026
- Messages
- 9
- Your ID
- 3975
- Admin's Name
- Hasan Hill
- Date of violation
- Oct 15, 2026
- Time of violation
- 16:33
Admin Hasan rejected this report saying:-
"Its not a RDM, there is a situation going on, you and your frnds are trying steal vehicle you are guys there cz you are protect him when your frnd are trying to steal his car, he get notified on his screen and minimap that his car getting stolen, they have full right to shoot you and protect that vehicle from you, i can see in your pov that ID 99 successfully saved his car and car disappeared from there so there is no RDM and ID 177 warned you "just keep watching or you will die" but you didn't hear him you step out from your car and try to patch your frnd, thats why they killed you."
there r a lot of things that trouble me
1st thing its not me or all my frnds trying to steal the car, it was just one guy trying to steal the car, we were there just for curiosity to see if he can do it or not bcoz that car had theft protection.
then he says we were there for protecting our frnd, i don't understand this part. How were we protecting him? did he saw any of us trying to resist by blocking their way or fight back or shoot back at the other party? not even one of us had a gun, there were 6 of us and 3 of them, if were there to help we would be prepared, why didn't we fight back? i think that part is clearly visible in the pov.
after that he said they have right to shoot at us for protecting their car, alright its fair, u can shoot and kill the guy trying to steal your car, bcoz when he is in mid of animation there is no other option, but how is it ok to shoot everyone who is nearby, how they know we are with the thief or not? We did not try to protect him clearly. (only u can see in my pov we are frnds bcoz u can see all names)
the last part, the ID 177 says "or you will die, just keep watching" he clearly was trying to say something before but its unclear and not audible u can see in the pov. So there was no clear warning from them that what i should or should not do, then why admin Hasan is giving clarification in behalf of them? is it bcoz they are old players?
"Its not a RDM, there is a situation going on, you and your frnds are trying steal vehicle you are guys there cz you are protect him when your frnd are trying to steal his car, he get notified on his screen and minimap that his car getting stolen, they have full right to shoot you and protect that vehicle from you, i can see in your pov that ID 99 successfully saved his car and car disappeared from there so there is no RDM and ID 177 warned you "just keep watching or you will die" but you didn't hear him you step out from your car and try to patch your frnd, thats why they killed you."
there r a lot of things that trouble me
1st thing its not me or all my frnds trying to steal the car, it was just one guy trying to steal the car, we were there just for curiosity to see if he can do it or not bcoz that car had theft protection.
then he says we were there for protecting our frnd, i don't understand this part. How were we protecting him? did he saw any of us trying to resist by blocking their way or fight back or shoot back at the other party? not even one of us had a gun, there were 6 of us and 3 of them, if were there to help we would be prepared, why didn't we fight back? i think that part is clearly visible in the pov.
after that he said they have right to shoot at us for protecting their car, alright its fair, u can shoot and kill the guy trying to steal your car, bcoz when he is in mid of animation there is no other option, but how is it ok to shoot everyone who is nearby, how they know we are with the thief or not? We did not try to protect him clearly. (only u can see in my pov we are frnds bcoz u can see all names)
the last part, the ID 177 says "or you will die, just keep watching" he clearly was trying to say something before but its unclear and not audible u can see in the pov. So there was no clear warning from them that what i should or should not do, then why admin Hasan is giving clarification in behalf of them? is it bcoz they are old players?
Last edited: