- Joined
- Sep 5, 2026
- Messages
- 5
- Your ID
- 3440
- Admin's Name
- Jack Cranley
- Date of violation
- Oct 30, 2026
- Time of violation
- 6:24
Jack was completely influenced by the third party commentators of the respective forum.
1. Jack said VDM was not intentional is Wrong. Can Jack explain why he turned his vehicle right and landed his vehicle on me??
2. Jack said that apologized which is wrong. Can jack explain how he heard his apology?? because in my pov id 7395 mic was not working properly?
Jack completely ignored that the id 7395 turned his vehicle right and stopped vehicle on me which is 2 times hit injury to give his biased decision.
He also imagined that the guy who landed vehicle on me gave apology without hearing. Is this a Joke?
1. Jack said VDM was not intentional is Wrong. Can Jack explain why he turned his vehicle right and landed his vehicle on me??
2. Jack said that apologized which is wrong. Can jack explain how he heard his apology?? because in my pov id 7395 mic was not working properly?
Jack completely ignored that the id 7395 turned his vehicle right and stopped vehicle on me which is 2 times hit injury to give his biased decision.
He also imagined that the guy who landed vehicle on me gave apology without hearing. Is this a Joke?