Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Reviewed Wrong Decision | Ibrahim Sheikh

New posts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lucifer Nox

Player
Joined
Sep 7, 2026
Messages
6
Your ID
3610
Admin's Name
Ibrahim Sheikh
Date of violation
Sep 26, 2026
Time of violation
17:50
Proofs
https://librarp.com/forums/threads/1512
First of all, this should be considered a third-party POV, even if you were involved in the situation. The person who was stealing the car should be the one posting the forum report.

2nd , 3497 was not even shooting anyone. That guy simply came and started shooting at him for no reason.

3rd , there is a tracking system in the phone that allows you to track your car. We used the tracker and followed them. In the end, we reached the chop shop first, and after a few seconds, they arrived as well, which is when we started shooting at them.

So, what is the point of having a car-tracking system in the phone if we are not allowed to use it to track our stolen car and confront the people stealing it?

I hope you can consider the full situation and the context before making a decision.
 
First of all, this should be considered a third-party POV, even if you were involved in the situation. The person who was stealing the car should be the one posting the forum report.

2nd , 3497 was not even shooting anyone. That guy simply came and started shooting at him for no reason.

3rd , there is a tracking system in the phone that allows you to track your car. We used the tracker and followed them. In the end, we reached the chop shop first, and after a few seconds, they arrived as well, which is when we started shooting at them.

So, what is the point of having a car-tracking system in the phone if we are not allowed to use it to track our stolen car and confront the people stealing it?

I hope you can consider the full situation and the context before making a decision.
  1. This is not 3rd party POV as everyone in the video is involved in same situation.
  2. He shoot or not he broke the rule of Fail RP, As camping the scrapyard is fail RP.
  3. It doesn't gives you the imunity to camp scrapyard.
 
No Off Topic :
No admins or any other player msg in "Complaints Against Administration" it is prohibited. Only the Curator of Admin or Higher Than can msg here
1) First thing first as of i know only higher admins/ curator of the project are allowed to reply on complaint about admins.How can a same admin reply to his own complaint or justified.Car stealing is single player RP situation,
2)In car stealing there is no such a rule that you need your friends/ team to steal a car.Who ever stole the car he should post his pov so it is the third party pov but you are justifying everyone are in the same situation right? the thing is the rp situation was ended before this pov which i got punished for 120mins jail.

Dear Higher UPs Kindly please check the pov i spent 120 mins of jail without any reason i hope and faith in you all to get justice for this Thank you
 
Firstly
i encourage all of my admins to reply to a compliant against them which allows me to hear it from both sides
i understand you would "know" that its going there after being stolen, but that doesn't give you the right to stay there and Camp it
However you are correct in the term that the POV has to come from the person
so your punishment will be removed.
next time i ask that you don't camp the chopshop​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top