Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Reviewed SR 1.2, GR 2.4 | ID: 3989

New posts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Joey Montana

Player
Joined
Aug 24, 2026
Messages
38
Your ID
3108
Suspect ID
3989
Date of violation
Sep 30, 2026
Time of violation
01:09
Proofs
https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/nD20Stvd4p5zo9jB9?invite=cr-MSxpUFYsODAwNzgwMjI5
An admin stated in Prime Chat that voting is IC and will be considered mixing if continued.

After going to gov and voting, I sat in my car and in rp chat I stated "A vote for Ahmed is a vote for change", "A vote for Malek is a vote for the same"

An admin then stated no campaigning or telling people how to vote in prime chat. Not only were my comments not telling people how to vote and just statements in roleplay chat, this was said by him in prime chat. Which he literally just explained was not IC, regardless of him being an admin this still applies. IC, no statement was ever issued to the public about campaigning at or near gov and if I was told to leave or given a warning to stop I would have left immediately.

I was tazed out of my vehicle by 3898 with no warning. I was not asked to leave or stop campaigning. I was not given demands. I was tazed, immediately handcuffed, and put in a car to DOC.

The fact that this officer took prime chat information to apply to a roleplay situation is GR 2.4. and if it is not that, then this was corruption by the current gov administration for silencing civilians campaigning against the current Vice Governor and is corruption without a bio. SR 1.2.
 
I would also like to add, I was fined under 2.10d, which does not exist. The officer said it was for 'provoking', which under current legislation does not seem to be a criminal offense. I was also leaving the public property, and 'provoking' cannot be an offense by an individual that is leaving or retreating.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-09-30 005617.webp
    Screenshot 2026-09-30 005617.webp
    5.4 KB · Views: 4
I will again add to the post. This is further proof of the abuse of power. 3989 was just jailed by an admin for the exact thing he arrested me for. The only difference is I did it before it was made a rule/legislation. This just proves he was biased when he broke rules against me.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-09-30 072030.webp
    Screenshot 2026-09-30 072030.webp
    17.3 KB · Views: 11
Reviewing​
 
Reviewed

Situation was delt ICly however ID 3989 will be issued Verbal warning as he didnt said anything before Tazing you out of your Car.
​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top