Search results
-
F
Reviewed Wrong Decision | Ibrahim Shiekh
I will review Ibrahims POV to determine if the punishment was properly issued. Ibrahim is 100% correct, he can not post his POV here, there is admin info, other players info, and other things that admin see in their POV that is not intended or allowed for players to see. I will review, and...- Fish Barone
- Post #19
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Incorrect Judgement | Ibhrahim sheikh
Approved After review of the previous forum, ID 1651, 1665, & 2986 will Receive punishment for CR 1.4. Be aware, Ibrahim was not necessarily incorrect for rejecting your forum. Per the rules of filing a complaint, the POV must be at least 1 minute long or show the full situation. He had every...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved GR 2.2 | 1811
I am stepping back in here. Jake, the fact that you got un-blacklisted, and in less 12 hours came back in and proverbially slapped us in the face by outright disregarding the rules is absolute nonsense. And the rule you broke is one that we all know is a rule without having to think about...- Fish Barone
- Post #7
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Servers Future | For Andy
I have not read the whole message, but i will go ahead and put one of your points to bed. Kanye did get banned for impersonating an admin, as did Nate. Kanye got unbanned, as did Nate.- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Wrong Decision | Whoever decided to click the button
I didnt ban, nor can i approve the unban, but i can confirm that you are not the first to get banned for impersonating an admin.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Wrong decision - Ibrahim Shiekh
Reviewed. I will get with the admin who handled the original forum to discuss and disseminate information properly. You are correct, no one other than leos can pit to stop. We can not assume that the pitting/ramming changed the outcome, as 1 you already had one flat tire, and 2 it doesn't...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected RDM I 49, 2564
Rejected I can not determine if this was RDM based on the POV provided. Please read the rules for posting a forum and you may post again if you feel the need. The POV is less than 1 minute and does not show the full situation.- Fish Barone
- Post #8
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Shooting outside the area.
Rejected. Per Event rules 1.2: It is forbidden to shoot into the Event Zone from outside or shoot from inside the Event Zone to outside. (Exception: A player may be shot outside the Event Zone if they were previously engaged within the zone.) | Refinement 30 Minutes Based on your explanation...- Fish Barone
- Post #9
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Wrong Decision I Ibrahim
The rule is referencing areas that are not accessible by foot. If the area is accessible simply by foot or car from within the zone, it is allowed. The rule is designed to prevent any area that can only be accessed by leaving the zone and re-entering, or any areas that can only be accessed with...- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved POV REQ | 2858
ID 2858 is only required to provide the POV from the situation that was submitted in this forum topic specifically, there is no requirement for him to provide the POV from the situation that was presented in the comment. If that POV wants to be requested, it needs to be in a forum submitted by...- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected power gaming ID 1811
Rejected. Not powergaming. He did what he is supposed to do. He did not shoot you, or tase you, he saw you commiting a crime, and placed you in handcuffs. There is no obligation to wait for you to finishing drilling the ATM to put you in cuffs. That would not make sense, he did not let you...- Fish Barone
- Post #11
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed All I am demanding is a proof!
Next time, post your forum with the correct format or it WILL be rejected.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed All I am demanding is a proof!
Firstly, what we are not going to do is just throw accusations that admins are protecting people because they are friends. secondly, the forum was closed after he results were given, as that is the procedure on how things are done. lastly, sharing admin POV is not something that is done just...- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong decision
Rejected You were killed by a rival gang, then you were revived by the same gang. Whether you say you can not hear while unconscious for the RP (which is not true for the RP, or else we wouldnt allow people to put in forums for rule breaks against unconcious players) or not, you were revived...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Wrong Decision | Mirza Bilal
Reviewed. The rule has been discussed and updated, as the intent of the rule was not clear, as you pointed out. For the punishment that was issued, at the time, without better clarification of the rule for everyone, it cannot be deemed as incorrect. For clarity for anyone that reads this, the...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed wrong decision | ibrahim sheikh
Reviewed You did not include a POV of the situation that you are discussing. I can not tell you whether Ibrahim made the correct or incorrect decision if you do not include the situation. Also, the photo you included is of someone, i can not tell who as you said a female asked and then...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected wrong decision | Mirza Bilal
Rejected. You got robbed, and then after they did shoot "at" you, but they did not shoot you directly, your reaction to turn around and go punch a gang member, in ghetto, with a gun, that just robbed you, is not realistic. No matter how mad you get because he shot in your direction. Also...- Fish Barone
- Post #8
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong decision I Ibrhahim Shik
Rejected. The correct punishment was handed out by Ibrahim. It was absolutely not RDM, you shot at them first, and did not upload the full POV of the interaction, which could be viewed as intentional to avoid showing that you shot at 49 first. For the accusation of MK, i agree with Ibrahim...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong Decision I Ibti
Rejected. As stated by Ibti, there was obviously a situation going on outside the DOC while you were inside, you can see it and hear it from the other person talking. You then proceeded to go outside and involve yourself in the situation. Once you went outside, mind you with a gun in hand and...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed For Andy
DO NONE OF YOU HAVE ANY COMMON DECENCY FOR THE OWNER OF THE SEVER??? He is getting married today and yall decide to blow up his server chats with this shit?? This is absolute nonsense. Why dont you all reflect on how to be a respectable person and not trash Andys project on what should be the...- Fish Barone
- Post #19
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong Decision | Mirza Bilal
Rejected. The incident at the bank involved you making OOC statements that a player had "done a service" by killing someone because of where they were from and then stating that all people from that geographic location should be killed because you do not like them. These statements constitute...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong Decision | Jacob Mandem
Rejected You are correct, you did punch them first. They then shot at you, and if they killed you then, would not have been punished for RDM, as it wasnt random, you started the hostile interaction by punching them. They stopped shooting at you and told you to "just go", you then decided to...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Still being biased for Avi
Lisen, its over. Stop spamming threads. The outcome will not change. Your inability to understand the rule does not make it a requirement that we punish what you want. I am not explaining this more than i already have. If you want further explanation, you can refer to my detailed response on one...- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved (Senior Curator) GR 2.1 | 140
Approved This one time, I will remove your punishment after speaking with the admin who issued the punishment. In the future, do not let another players statements or rule breaks persuade you to retaliate with another rule break. We must leave all OOC insults and conversations about the OOC...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Suggestion To The Project
Actually, i do agree with part of your statement. Transparency is very important, and when there is information is missing from a situation, it is human nature to fill in the blanks. Where i disagree though, is the expectation of what information should be shared by staff or in regards to staff...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong decision was made by Fish Barone and Blade | For Avi
Alright, lets just go ahead and get some clarification out there, as the narrative you are trying to sell to everyone just isnt true. While the timing of the rule changes may seem odd to you, it is just pure coincidence, and I do apologize for that. With a lot of response from the player base...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong Decision \ Blade
Rejected. you were punished for UB behavior, as moving around his vehicle constantly stating "misclick" (which could also be considered mixing) while shooting his tires out is unrealistic behavior and had no RP scenario to support it. As for the use of medal; simply using medal does not...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved NLR GR 5.5 I 146
Approved ID 146 will receive punishment for GR 5.5. You died, returned to your HQ, changed your makeup, and returned to the event. A clear and intentional rule break. No reduction in punishment will be considered.- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Massive Rule break + Fail RP - all LEO Organizations
Approved. FIB Will receive an Org Warn for this situation as they are the org in charge of the gang raid. Leaders of FIB and Bloods have already spoke in reference to this situation, and have clarified the issues that caused this and ensured them that this will not happen again.- Fish Barone
- Post #10
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Massive Rule break + Fail RP - all LEO Organizations
Reviewing- Fish Barone
- Post #9
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved MULTIPLE RULE BREAKS |42
After review there is a lot to dissect in this situation. ID 42 will receive a punishment for Fail RP & OOC insults (player also did commit mixing but that punishment is unnecessary due to other punishments) ID 258 will receive punishment for Fail RP. ID 1651 will receive punishment for PG...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Mixing in Discord itsgodzangel1265 ( Discord id )
Closed on request- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected wrongful punishment
Firstly, i know i am not involved per say with the punishment issued, but I was involved in the discussion of the forum prior to punishment being issued, and being Chief curator of State, i believe my response is justified. I can understand your frustration with the punishment, but as stated...- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected GR.5.2 | Fish Barone
I have The POV of you UB driving (jumping a supercar off the side of a hill on to the highway) to then CR a motorcyle that had two people on it, and then getting out and killing them (Mind you, this entire time was Ballas UB driving supercars on the mountain to shoot the LEOs who were in a...- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong decision | Fish Barone
The fail RP was not from the fact that you used the clan radio specifically. It was what was said in the communications. Telling them they are ruining your fun, that you will be contacting the clan leader to have them removed, and trying to get them to leave you alone or you will get them an org...- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Wrong Decision I Fish Barone
Using that type of language is not normal trash talk. I stand by my decision, as i dont think it was random. You knew what you were doing trying to provoke him in to what you feel is a rule break. Gang members jump to violence when provoked. Not unrealistic.- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected RDM I 49
Rejected. We can just go ahead and end this forum war, personal vendetta now. You trash talked and instigated a person who was obviously in gang clothes and expected them not to react. Lets also not forget that officers that uphold the law are not to conduct themselves like that.- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Mass Rulebreak | LSPD
Approved (Partially) 1586 - GR 5.20 (1:53) 328 - GR 5.20 (4:07) 559 - GR 6.6 Lets discuss The RP begins the moment you start hotwiring a car. You were given demands to pull over before any ramming or pitting happened. your first demand was given at 1:02. Every single leo is not required to...- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Fail Rp | 82
Rejected. Forum has been edited and changed after original posting. Also, without seeing longer POV explaining entire situation from all sides, i can not assume i know why he was or wasnt shooting at other people in your POV. If you want to upload again, you are welcome to, but please provide...- Fish Barone
- Post #6
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected POV Req - ID 1674
Rejected. I do agree that the location the bullets were coming from was suspicious and could potentially deem a POV request, but there is nothing in your POV that supports the ID number you provided being the shooter, or any information in the POV that could tell me who the shooter could be...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Pov REQ - Breaking to many rules | 0000
Rejected. The entirety of the improper arrest, ignoring command, improper IC punishment of jail instead of fine, even you losing your job are issues that have to be handled IC by hiring a lawyer and sueing the individual and/or org if deemed it was incorrect. Admin can not step in on these...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Possible Cheats | 350
Player has already received 7 day ban due to other rule breaks.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected pov request | 350
Rejected. You uploaded a 3 second POV. The intent of a POV request is for admin to determine if the situation was suspicious or seems like someone is cheating/rule breaking, not just so you can see how you died. You can create a new forum and include a longer POV if you would like us to...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved CR | 1159
Approved ID 1159 will receive punishment for GR 5.22. 1159, for clarification, if you read the rules about robbing. you one car and two people. he is not required to stop at that point. you CR him off the road. You admitted in your comment that your intent was to ram him hard enough to turn...- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Pov Request | 247
Rejected. After review and confirmation with the damage logs, you were shot by two different players at very similar time which appeared it to be sus in real time.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Fail RP | State orgs
Rejected. The POV does not provide evidence on who shot first. Also, we discussed this after the event and just stating what we discussed. If one side, whether Legal or criminal, is outnumbered at least 3-1 at a situation, the only negotiating that is required is for a hostage. No fighting...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved LEO Orgs - GR 5.6 5.11 6.5 6.6
Approved (Partially) ID 1723 Will receive punishment for GR 5.6 (NLR) He did perform Fail RP for killing (not MK) you as you were unconscious and in handcuffs. An additional punishment will not be applied, as you would have bled out prior to the patch if he would have tried to, and outcome...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Rule Breaks - LSPD/LEO Orgs
Partially Approved. For the first situation, LSPD recieved a verbal warning for arresting (during negotiations) and then leaving suspect in custody in the car in the area of the gun fight. The second situation, the negotiations were happening in the road, and the person who was detained was...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved GR 5.3 | 957
Approved ID 957 will receive punishment for 5.3- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved GR 2.2, GR 5.4 | ID: 1616
Approved. 1616 will receive punishment for GR 2.2 & 5.4 (3 days for 2.2, next time will be full punishment)- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved GR 5.4 I ID:1616
Approved. ID 1616 will receive punishment for GR 5.4- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved G.H.R 1.4 | 353
Approved ID 353 will receive punishment for GHR (Crime rules) 1.4- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed RDM || 375
Reviewed 375 will not receive RDM, as she told you to get the f*** out of here at the beginning of the POV. 1393 will receive VDM. He has received at least 6 punishments for CR/VDM and last night his punishment was lowed based on him promising to not do it again. He will get full punishment...- Fish Barone
- Post #6
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected mass rule break,teaming in event || 1317,375,1144,1115,953
Locked for Curator of Crime- Fish Barone
- Post #6
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected mass rule break,teaming in event || 1317,375,1144,1115,953
Reviewing- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected pov req | 483
Rejected You can see in your POV exactly how you died. You ran out in the open and got shot by the two officers on the left (your vest was completely depleted but visually did not come off your body). Then you got shot by the two people directly in front of you, which killed you. The person who...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Pov Request | 375
Rejected There is nothing suspicious in this POV. you can see the other player moving in your POV. you were moving around an open door and they were shooting through open door.- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved Mass Rule Break | Ballas
Will need more POV of entire situation, as it appears the situation began before the POV shows. Will be locked for Curator of Ballas or Curator or Curator of Crime once POV is posted. No other comments allowed other than POV attachement- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Fail Rp | Leos
There are no rule breaks seen in the POV. If you feel that the arrest was done improperly or there is a problem with the way the officers handled it, you need to hire a lawyer and talk with them as that is a matter that must be handled in character.- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Leader for SAHP | Enzo Delavega
Unfortunately, the window for applications had closed. We appreciate you time and effort and hope to see you applying for additional leadership roles in the future.- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Leader of SAHP | Souf Bombo | 223
Unfortunately the window for applications has closed. We appreciate your interest and hope this doesn't discourage you from applying in the future.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected GR 5.14 I 1231
Rejected He does not need to pull over according to G.R. 5.14You are allowed to shoot his tires out if you've asked him to pull over and he does not comply. If he fails to stop after his tires are shot out, it is considered Fail RP.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected POV Request I 0000
Rejected No POV needed. There were already other gang members in the zone, and you were standing just outside. With the way that the zone boundaries are set up and not visible at ground level, we can not expect anyone to be able to differentiate between that small of a difference in where you...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved PG I 1072
Accepted ID 49 will be punished for PG. 60 minute refinement.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Approved VDM | 225
Accepted 225 will receive punishment for GR 6.1 (VDM) 953 will receive punishment for ZR 1.4 (you left a situation that you were involved in and entered the safe zone of PH)- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected PG, Meta gaming,ZR 1.4,Ub driving || 49, 1234 ,304
Rejected This interaction begun a long time before your POV shows. Everyone in your POV was involved in the situation prior to your POV. There is no evidence of meta gaming in this POV. For PG for the taser, it is not possible to tell in the POV who tased you so I cannot punish anyone for that...- Fish Barone
- Post #5
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected PG, Meta gaming,ZR 1.4,Ub driving || 49, 1234 ,304
Reviewing- Fish Barone
- Post #4
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Reviewed Pov Request | 262
On consideration. ID 262 has 24 hours to Provide POV.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected GR 2.2 Violation | Toxic Language & Disrespect Toward Officer | ID 670
Rejected. The individual acted in a way that if realistic for someone that was just kicked off their motorcycle. That is not the F word referred to in 2.2. Also, it appeared that he apologized as soon as you said it was the wrong muscle, even though your voice can not be hear in the POV.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected UB | 299
Rejected. With the POV provided, it is not enough to prove how far or why he drove in that condition.- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected PG | 1052
Rejected. While he did use a taser during a gun fight, he never landed a shot, and would have been considered power gaming if he used it to tase you, then shoot you while on the ground. In this case, it was not.- Fish Barone
- Post #6
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected GR 2.2 Violation | Toxic Language & Disrespect Toward Officer | ID 670
Reviewing- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected ER : 1.10 | 000 Ballas
Rejected The heli was in the zone prior to the gun fight starting. Without POV proving that the heli was outside the event zone for more than the allowed 15 seconds, a rule break can not be proven. Ballas will be spoken to by their Curator to ensure they are not breaking rules. Also, sitting...- Fish Barone
- Post #3
- Forum: Archive
-
F
Rejected Wrong decision | Fish Money
Locking For Executive action.- Fish Barone
- Post #2
- Forum: Archive
