Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Pending Review Wrong decision was made by Fish Barone and Blade | For Avi

Status
Not open for further replies.

tooquick

Player
Joined
Jul 6, 2026
Messages
15
Your ID
2270
Admin's Name
blade and fish
Date of violation
Jul 22, 2026
Time of violation
18:00
Proofs
http://itsallabove.net/
1784757042802.webp
He stated this which 5.14 was changed to 5.13 without an announcement with the time this forum was made and when I pointed it out in the forum the rule 5.14 immediately changed to 5.13 says something else. I got fucked for absolutely no reason. he said that the rules states that using it for that purpose is forbidden but when i didnt point this out in the forum https://librarp.com/forums/threads/707/#post-2742 the rules was 5.14 OBS and any other Recording software WHICH can block or remove overlays are forbidden and it results in 15 day ban. This is wrong u changed the rules without an announcement when i pointed it out it seems very unfair. 1784757168839.webp
 
You can see the time when the rule changed, so within the forum time rules 5.14 remained, it basically meant none of these clipping softwares are allowed no matter what
 
Alright, lets just go ahead and get some clarification out there, as the narrative you are trying to sell to everyone just isnt true. While the timing of the rule changes may seem odd to you, it is just pure coincidence, and I do apologize for that.

With a lot of response from the player base, multiple admins, and myself, sat down the last couple days and reviewed the rules to attempt to make the punishments more appropriately match the impact that the action had on the RP at the time, or the server as a whole. We also dove into the rules to reword rules that we felt may have been worded in a way that could be misunderstood. That is why you will see multiple changes across all rules sections when you review them. The rule specifically in question, referring to what recording software is being used, was rewritten to be directed the act of using any recording software to hide overlays or cheating software. It is not intended to be used to get someone banned just simply because they use a software, that a lesser person, would utilize in a way its not intended, and to use any cheat or anything to give themselves an advantage over others while not making it visibly noticeable in their recording. We are not here to punish people just because they use a certain recording software. That would be unfair to those who have restrictions on what they can use, or what's available to them, and we want to harness an environment that encourages people to have the freedom to make the choices that they want, without fear of repercussions, as long as they are not doing something that causes a negative impact on others or gives them an unfair advantage.

Yes the rules were updated and posted in between the time your initial forum complaint went in, and the time you received my response. You decided to jump in my DMs and basically demand that I ban the other player simply based on your perception of the rule. I DO NOT implement punishments based on DMs nor do I treat anyone differently simply because another player isn't happy. The simple thought that you would be able to come to my DMs, and demand I read and understand the rule in a way it is not intended, because that is what you wanted, is incorrect.

You are correct, we did publish the rules, and there was a period of time before the announcement was published to tell everyone that it was done. The reasoning behind that, is one admin typed the documents as we were doing a full rule review, then they posted them. The time between then and the announcements was the time that the rest of the people involved read over them to ensure everything was published properly and there were still no correction or changes that we missed.

I do apologize that this may seem like you were somehow treated unfair, but you were punished for a clear and intentional rule break, and a retribution punishment to the player that put that complaint in just because you believe that your interpretation of the rule is more correct than the group of individuals whose job it is to write and uphold the rules is simply not going the proper way for things to be handled. The rule that is referenced for this forum, is not the only rule that was changed so please don't make insinuations that we changed one specific rule just to avoid giving another player a punishment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top